Arlington National Cemetery update

Interesting comments in Monday’s Washington Post regarding the ongoing fiasco at the Arlington National Cemetery. “and lack of oversight led to the mishandling of dozens of remains at the nation’s most important military burial ground, according to a three-month review of Arlington National Cemetery’s operations by a consortium of technology companies.” The last sentence in the article is “The report, prepared for the cemetery at no cost, also said that each set of remains should be given a file with a unique case number to link all relevant paperwork.” duh.

Interesting that tech companies came to the conclusion that the records should have been computerized. I agree, but also feel that a paper and card system would have worked if it has been given proper attention. Computerization also only works if given the proper attention and all data entry is accomplished without
mistakes. I remember being on a tour of Arlington years ago and asking a question in the office about research in the records and hearing the shaky answers about how things could be looked up. Hmmm — should that have been a warning? At the time I figured it was yet another cemetery employee shuddering at a family history question.

Click here to read the full article.

1784 Map of the U.S. to be displayed at LOC

An article in Sunday’s Washington Post tells the tale of how the Library of Congress will be able to display the first map of the United States. “The first map of the United States, created in 1784, has been purchased for the record price of $1.8 million by Washington philanthropist David M. Rubenstein, who is lending it to the Library of Congress.”

This map is an original drawn by Connecticut resident Abel Buell and Rubenstein wants the LOC to display it for five years. He said “I just think Americans don’t know enough about their history. Showing documents spurs them to learn more.” I agree with this statement. Whether I am teaching beginners or advanced family historians, the ability to see a document connects them more fully to the document and time period. It also spurs them to find such documents that relate to their own ancestry.

The Christie’s auction house website describes the map as “the first map of the U.S. published in America, the first map printed in America to show the flag of the United States and the first map to be copyrighted in the United States.” That would be the NEW United States of America! 

Rubenstein has purchased other historical documents and made them available for public viewing. The map had been put up for auction by the New Jersey Historical Society as a means of raising operating funds. I think we will see more historical societies, archives, and libraries employing such methods to keep them going in today’s era of extreme lack of governmental support for historical organizations and libraries.

Click here to read the full article. Click here to see the map description at Christie’s auction house.

Miscellaneous Serendipity!

Some of my favorite records are those labeled as “miscellaneous” or “loose.” Others are data in the back of a totally unrelated record book or on the back of a note or index card.
                               
Miscellaneous
These may be a collection of related or unrelated papers and the dates of coverage may not be clear. The Family History Library Catalog www.familysearch.org does include some miscellaneous court and vital records. Do a keyword search for “miscellaneous” in the catalog or that of any record repository. A state or other archive online catalog or in-house inventory may show a couple of volumes of “Miscellaneous Records” for a town or county. A check of the catalog of the Missouri State Archives http://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/ using only the word miscellaneous yields “Miscellaneous Court Records.” The subject tracings include
elections and I would check this out to see if any personal names are listed.

The North Carolina State Archives http://www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us/Archives/records_county.htm has informative descriptions of what may be found in county records it holds and miscellaneous records are frequently listed. One items is “Miscellaneous Court Records: Includes boxes of miscellaneous court records and dockets from both Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions and Superior Court.” It is possible that some miscellaneous records are not found in the most likely court indexes.

Loose Papers
Back at the Missouri State Archives site, I also noted some “loose papers” that refer to Missouri Militia 1861-1865 and include orders, discharges, deaths, and desertions. Neither the state or the counties were recording deaths at this time period. Loose papers may refer to records that were kept on loose pages or possibly a probate file (or parts) that is in a packet and not in a volume. Loose papers may be less likely to survive than a bound volume. When county records were turned over to an archive, the resulting finding aid often called a section of loose, possibly unrelated, or previously bound pages, simply “loose papers” or “miscellaneous.” Loose papers turn up when a courthouse or other government entity moves into a new building or transfers records to an archive.

A minister or justice of the peace faithfully turned in a piece of paper or a signed certificate with the details of an ancestor’s marriage. Are you sure the county clerk recorded that or did it end up in a pile of “loose papers?”

Back of the book
I have a couple pages that list teacher salaries with information on when they taught and their own education that I found in the back of another school related record book. A clerk may have run out of room in the proper volume and used the back of another volume to enter data. The clerks certainly did not have “print on demand” for volumes in which to record official business. If you ever saw me in an archive or a courthouse, you would know I go to the back of the book first. No, not to check for an index, but to see if there are any gems on those pages. When viewing microfilm, check at the end of that volume for such neat items. A notation there may be about a relative.

Turn it over

When taking my own genealogical notes by hand or printing out pages, I resist using the back side of the paper, index card, or other paper. I am afraid that later I will not remember to check that back side. A microfilm of a newspaper index might be helpful, but the camera operator may not have looked at the reverse side of the cards. I have a copy from a  microfilmed newspaper index which has cards with extensive hand abstracted details from an obituary. Thankfully this camera operator did turn the card over and film the notation stating that the details were incorrect and that it was actually the obit for the brother, and it also states the person listed on the other side was still alive!

The lesson?

The lesson from this? Turn over every piece of paper. Check state and federal archival catalogs and other finding aids for “loose” or miscellaneous” records. Ancestry.com has miscellaneous records within some databases. Use the online and microfilmed sources, but try to find the actual original records to check the back of the book, find the folder of loose paper, and look at the back of the index card.

The Illinois Supreme County and O’Hare Airport Expansion

The Chicago Tribune has declined to hear the case of the preservation of the cemetery that sits on land O’Hare Airport wants for expansion. This means that the ruling of a lower court will stand and likely the known 1,000 people buried there will be disinterred. St. Johannes Cemetery is 161 years old. I am willing to bet that there are many people who don’t know they have family there. Other may not realize that the graves near the relatives they do know about are also related to them.

Gone will the the family groupings, gone will be the community and church history that the groupings of burials reflects, and gone will be the historic resting place.

Archivist of the U.S. to answer questions online

Tomorrow, Thursday, 27 January 2011, David S. Ferriero, the Archivist of the United States will be online via the Washington Post‘s website. This will take place at noon Eastern Time. Click here for details or to leave a question. Then at noon EST check back to see the questions and answers. This appearance is in connection to the alteration of a document at the National Archives that I discussed earlier this week.

I have another appointment at that hour but will check in later to read the conversation.

Watch WDYTYA with a group in Minnesota

Are you getting ready to watch the new season of Who Do You Think You Are? It would more fun to watch it with a group of others who love researching family history. The Minnesota Genealogical Society is hosting a fun, social get-together to help kickoff  the 2nd season of
“Who Do You Think You Are?”
Please join us as we watch the premiere show for the 2011 season.  Bring your family and friends!  We will begin with some eats, then enjoy the show, and stay around for some discussion or socializing.

Who:  MGS members and their friends
What:  Viewing of the TV show, “Who Do You Think You Are?”
When:  Friday, February 4, 6:00 – 9:00 pm 
Where:  MGS Library and Research Center, 1185 Concord Street North, South Saint Paul

This is a FREE program for MGS members and friends.  To help us plan, please RSVP by emailing Jay Fonkert by Feb,. 2.
If you can donate food or snacks, contact Jen de Fiebre.
Please join us for this fun evening.  The cost is FREE and we will have a few doorprizes by Ancestry.com, too!  To find out more about the show, click here.
 

Season 2 of WDYTYA features: Gwyneth Paltrow, Tim McGraw, Rosie O’Donnell, Steve Buscemi, Kim Cattrall, Lionel Richie, Vanessa Williams, and Ashley Judd.
For more information about MGS, click here. 
Not a member? Why not join MGS that evening!

Author and Lincoln researcher alleged to have altered a document

This press release was sent by the U.S. National Archives. As I read this I stood up in my office and yelled “it wasn’t a genealogist!” So often those researching their family history are blamed for things that happen in repositories.

The Washington Post had a lengthy and informative article on the matter. Part of that article states “Archives officials, after a year-long investigation, say Lowry signed a written confession Jan. 12 that he brought a fountain pen into the research room sometime in 1998 and wrote a 5 over the 4 in 1864, using a fade-proof ink. Lowry, a retired psychiatrist who discovered the pardon in an unsorted file box, has denied any wrongdoing. He said he was pressured by federal agents to confess.” 

Never, never, never alter an original document, never “correct” items that appear out of order, don’t reorganize files, and shudder, never take any document. If something in a file or box at any repository seems out of order or that something is awry, bring it to the attention of the staff. Like with the airlines, even careful and innocent people will be subjected to greater scrutiny because of the misdeeds of a few
                                                        

January 24, 2011
National Archives Discovers Date Change on Lincoln Record
Thomas Lowry Confesses to Altering Lincoln Pardon to April 14, 1865
Washington, DC… Archivist of the United States David S. Ferriero announced today that Thomas Lowry, a long-time Lincoln researcher from Woodbridge, VA, confessed on January 12, 2011, to altering an Abraham Lincoln Presidential pardon that is part of the permanent records of the U.S. National Archives.  The pardon was for Patrick Murphy, a Civil War soldier in the Union Army who was court-martialed for desertion. 
Lowry admitted to changing the date of Murphy’s pardon, written in Lincoln’s hand, from April 14, 1864, to April 14, 1865, the day John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, DC.  Having changed the year from 1864 to 1865, Lowry was then able to claim that this pardon was of significant historical relevance because it could be considered one of, if not the final official act by President Lincoln before his assassination.
See images of the document and a National Archives’ produced “Inside the Vaults” video short about this discovery online at http://go.usa.gov/Y1R.  The images and video are in the public domain and not subject to any copyright restrictions. 
In 1998, Lowry was recognized in the national media for his “discovery” of the Murphy pardon, which was placed on exhibit in the Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom in the National Archives Building in Washington, DC.  Lowry subsequently cited the altered record in his book, Don’t Shoot That Boy: Abraham Lincoln and Military Justice, published in 1999.
In making the announcement, the Archivist said, “I am very grateful to Archives staff member Trevor Plante and the Office of the Inspector General for their hard work in uncovering this criminal intention to rewrite history.  The Inspector General’s Archival Recovery Team has proven once again its importance in contributing to our shared commitment to secure the nation’s historical record.”
National Archives archivist Trevor Plante reported to the National Archives Office of Inspector General that he believed the date on the Murphy pardon had been altered:  the “5” looked like a darker shade of ink than the rest of the date and it appeared that there might have been another number under the “5”.  Investigative Archivist Mitchell Yockelson of the Inspector General’s Archival Recovery Team (ART) confirmed Plante’s suspicions.
In an effort to determine who altered the Murphy pardon, the Office of the Inspector General contacted Lowry, a recognized Lincoln subject-matter expert, for assistance.  Lowry initially responded, but when he learned the basis for the contact, communication to the Office of Inspector General ceased. 
On January 12, 2011, Lowry ultimately agreed to be interviewed by the Office of the Inspector General’s special agent Greg Tremaglio.  In the course of the interview, Lowry admitted to altering the Murphy pardon to reflect the date of Lincoln’s assassination in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2071. Against National Archives regulations, Lowry brought a fountain pen into a National Archives research room where, using fadeproof, pigment-based ink, he altered the date of the Murphy pardon in order to change its historical significance. 
This matter was referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution; however the Department of Justice informed the National Archives that the statute of limitations had expired, and therefore Lowry could not be prosecuted.   The National Archives, however, has permanently banned him from all of its facilities and research rooms. 
Inspector General Paul Brachfeld expressed his tremendous appreciation for the work of Plante and the Inspector General’s Archival Recovery Team in resolving this matter.  Brachfeld added that “the stated mission of ART is ‘archival recovery,’ and while the Murphy pardon was neither lost or stolen, in a very real way our work helped to ‘recover’ the true record of a significant period in our collective history.”
At a later date, National Archives conservators will examine the document to determine whether the original date of 1864 can be restored by removing the “5”.

Ancestry.com discontinues Expert Connect

I received this press release from Ancestry.com today:

“Over a year ago Ancestry.com created Expert Connect as a way to expand its service offerings and provide additional assistance for members through an elite group of professional genealogists and researchers. Through this service, customers were given the opportunity to hire genealogists to retrieve records, perform research or simply acquire expert advice. Though this service has been a positive experience, Ancestry.com
has decided to focus on other business priorities, so as of March 18, 2011, Expert Connect will no longer be a service that Ancestry.com will offer to its members.”

Interesting that it has been discontinued just before the 2011 edition of Who Do You Think You Are? debuts on Friday, February 4th. I am guessing that it will now be promoting it’s own research arm, ProGenealogists, a company that Ancestry acquired in 2010.

If you know of someone in need of the services of a professional genealogist, here are some ways to locate just the person to do the research, consultation, editing, software tutoring, or whatever genealogy related services are needed.

  • Board for Certification of Genealogists, Inc., P.O. Box 14291 Washington, D.C. 20044. The Roster of Certified Genealogists is available online: www.bcgcertification.org
  • Association of Professional Genealogists,  P.O. Box 350998, Westminster, CO 80035-0998. Membership organization with an online Directory of Professional Genealogists at www.apgen.org.
  • International Commission for the Accreditation of Professional Genealogists (ICAPGen) View the Find an AG Professional at www.icapgen.org.
  • An archive, genealogical society, or historical organization in your ancestral areas may have a list of area researchers for hire.

Still need a 2011 Calendar? Even better, a genealogy one?

Everyday Genealogy 2011” should fit the bill! Each day of the tear-off desk calendar gives a genealogy tip, website, blog, history fact, or other tidbit useful to genealogists.

Everyday Genealogy is available on Amazon or on its own website http://www.everydaygenealogy.com/. Pattie Schultz, the creator, says “there is also an iPhone version available on iTunes. There are research tips covering all 50 states, suggestions for getting family members involved, connecting through social networks, monthly blogs and book recommendation and much more. The best part is 99% of the suggestions refer users to FREE sites.”

It is now priced at $9.99. Be sure to check out September 1st for a mention of this very blog! My calendar is sitting right next to me on my desk. Today’s entry reminds us to check for the many useful genealogy videos on YouTube.com.

Early bird discount registration for RootsTech ends Jan. 15th

SALT LAKE CITY—The $99 early bird registration for the RootsTech 2011 Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah, ends January 15, 2011. RootsTech is a completely new conference focused on bringing technology creators together with genealogy technology users to learn together and identify solutions to family history research challenges. Genealogists and family historians will discover exciting new research tools while technology creators will learn the latest development techniques from industry leaders and pioneers.
The registration fee includes three full days of conference attendance, conference materials, entry to the Clarke Planetarium dinner event, extended access to the Family History Library, admission to the closing reception event, eligibility for prize drawings, and admission to the Community Zone (exhibition hall).

Advancing technology is becoming an integral part of the future of genealogical research. Whether a person is new to genealogy or is an experienced researcher, RootsTech is the ideal place to discover the latest family history tools. In addition, technology creators will learn the skills needed to deliver innovative applications and systems, and they will have the opportunity to receive instant feedback from peers and users on their ideas and creations.
Keynote speakers at the conference include Shane Robinson, Hewlett Packard chief strategy and technology officer; Brewster Kahle, founder of the Internet Archive and digital librarian; Jay L. Verkler, CEO of FamilySearch International; and Curt Witcher, Historical Genealogy Department manager for Allen County Public Library.
About RootsTech
RootsTech is a new conference designed to bring technologists together with genealogists to learn from each other and find solutions to the challenges faced in family history research today. The conference’s activities and offerings are focused on content that will help genealogists and family historians discover exciting new research tools while enabling technology creators to learn the latest development techniques from industry leaders and pioneers.